Search Counselor

Login

Banner

Poll

How Do You Prefer to Get Your Continuing Education?
 

Events Calendar

July 2010
S M T W T F S
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Current Issue

Subscribe!

CLASSIFIEDS

Advertising Sales Manager

Health Communications, Inc., a publisher of best-selling books and a leading magazine for addiction professionals, and U.S. Journal Training, Inc., a provider of continuing education conferences and online courses for addiction and mental health professionals, seek an in-house Advertising Sales Manager.

Read more...

Addiction And Recovery News

No Feed URL specified.
Banner
BUY VIAGRA ON LINE
Buy Viagra Online Without Prescription
Food Addiction
Energy Drink Nation: Caffeine Intoxication at Warp Speed Print E-mail
Feature Articles - Food Addiction
Written by Howard Rosenthal, EdD, CCMH, LPC, NCC, MAC   
Wednesday, 26 May 2010 10:19

Everybody keeps talking about how the world has changed, but quite frankly, I wasn’t convinced. As a teenager I shaved with a single blade. I’ve graduated to a two-blade razor and if I pushed the envelope, I could upgrade to six. But is that really such a big deal? Growing up, my phone was limited by the cord in the wall; whereas the cell phone I use today allows me to call a friend in the Midwest while traveling at 60 mph on a major
Florida highway. Granted it’s a change, but here again, I would hardly say it’s monumental.

Strangely enough, my epiphany occurred when I was completing some research at the local university library. It was blistering hot day, and with the mercury making its sojourn beyond the 100 mark, I headed for the vending machine to secure a bottle of water before tackling the long walk to my car. Unfortunately, there were no waters to be found in the machine. Okay, I told myself, I’ll settle for a soft drink; but no soft drinks in the machine, either. Instead the machine was packed wall-to-wall with energy drinks. Is this what today’s graduate students are drinking?
Welcome to the new world order: energy drink nation. Now I was convinced the world had changed.

Imagine a cup of Joe juiced up on steroids!

Energy drinks have names that practically jump off the cans at you. These drinks sound bold and powerful, like a recipe for excitement, if not disaster. Make no mistake,these drinks pack a manly punch. You won’t find them stashed next to your little sister’s Barbie collection . . . at
least let’s hope you won’t! Simply put, these are beverages that walk with a swagger. Slam a few swigs down and you’ll feel like Chuck Norris’ tough sidekick buddy in a cop movie. Consider some of the current favorites: Monster (Coca Cola’s foray into the energy drink market);Full Throttle (as in flooring your car); RockStar; Spike Shooter; Bawls (oh come now, could I make that up?); NOS, or its cousin NOS Power -shot, that promises a more concentrated version of the former (as in nitrous oxide to make your car take off like a scared rabbit replete with a can designed to mimic a nitrous oxide tank for your street racer). There is Red Jak, Red Bull (red is hot right?); and AMP (after all, what guy doesn’t want a killer mega-watt earth-shattering amplifier in his car?). It’s no surprise that 65 percent of the this market’s consumers are males, most of whom are in the 13 to 35 age range. A 15 year-old male I was counseling proudly announced he would look cool walking up to a group of his peers with a Monster Energy drink in his hand. Hmm? I’ll need to think about that one before I can respond with accurate empathy.
When I was young, folks got a lift from nickel cup of Joe (aka coffee) or maybe a Dr. Pepper advertised to give you a lift at 10, 2 and 4. Dr. Pepper created the pitch after Dr. Walter Eddy of Columbia University discovered that most people experience energy slumps at 10:30, 2:30 and 4:30. Then, in 1985, Jolt Cola set the stage with that oh-so-memorable slogan, “All the sugar and twice the caffeine.” Was life in the 80s great or what?

Caffeine, a diuretic, is a central nervous system stimulant that in small or moderate dosages improves concentration and clarity of thought with
increased pulse rate, higher blood pressure and faster breathing. The pause that refreshes, and then some Colas, pops and soft drinks—the
ancestors of today’s liquid powerhouses— have a somewhat shady past. Coca Cola, for example, was named after its two medicinal ingredients
coca and kola nut; and indeed, most of us have heard correctly that the early formulations of Coca Cola did contain traces of cocaine. Interest ingly enough, this practice finally bit the dust about the same time as the depression-era ad campaign “the pause that refreshes” was unleashed
in 1929. Of course, you could rationally argue that it was a different time and a different era. However, it would be mighty difficult to excuse Red Bull when it was caught containing a pinch of cocaine in this day and age, and was thus banned in several German States.

It’s the caffeine, stupid!
Why do people drink energy drinks? To use a play on words based on Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign: It’s the caffeine, stupid! Caffeine, a diuretic, is a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant that in small or moderate dosages improves concentration and clarity of thought with increased pulse rate, higher blood pressure and faster breathing.Small wonder some experts have dubbed it as “the world’s most popular psychoactive substance.” Like alcohol, caffeine has the power to cross the blood-brain barrier. Some people claim that a little caffeine is good for you, but the cold, hard truth is that even if a little is good for you, a lot isn’t necessarily better and, in fact, could prove deadly!

If caffeine consumption gets too high caffeine intoxication may set in. This state is characterized by insomnia, an inability to concentrate, a state of nervousness (aka caffeine jitters), irregular heartbeat, hyperactivity, gastrointestinal difficulties, rambling speech and flushing in the facial area.
On the street it is often referred to as “energy drink overdose.”So just how much caffeine is too much? Surprisingly, it’s not that much! According to the DSM IV-TR 250 mg is enough to produce the condition. That’s about two or three cups of brewed coffee or approximately the amount in just a single 24-ounce Rockstar Energy Drink. A single can of Core Fast would put you way over the limit by providing a bomber’s load of 300 mg. A 24-ounce Boo-Koo Energy drink will top that at 360 mg. Fixx Extreme, aimed at the serious athletic market, boasts an Ultra Shot of .17 ounce that yields 400 mg of caffeine. Good golly Miss Molly!

Soft drinks are lightweights at best then placed in a side-by-side comparison with today’s energy drinks. A 16-ounces can of Full throttle contains
more than three times the caffeine of a 12 ounces can of Coca-Cola Classic, citing the American Beverage Association as the source to back up
this statement. Jolt Cola tops with list with 72 mg of caffeine for a 12 oz. serving. Mellow Yellow and Mountain Dew—the in drinks for the bad boys, girls, party people and gamers prior to the release of the current crop of energy drinks—contains approximately 52 to 54 mg per 12-ounces
Coke is just 35 mg with Dr. Pepper hovering around the 40 mark. A pit stop at Ben and Jerry’s for a serving of Coffee Heath Crunch ice cream
will supply 84 mg of the good stuff. Your morning cup of coffee contains about 80 to 135 mg if it is brewed and about 65 to 100 mg for instant. An iced tea will provide approximately 20 to 45 mg while that healthy green tea you love has just 15 mg. Hot chocolate will run about the same as the green tea. Caffeine-induced symptoms now account for nearly 2,500 emergency room visits in the United States each year. Incidentally, guarana, a berry grown in South America and a common ingredient in energy drinks, gums and shots, is an extremely rich source of caffeine. Users often compound the danger when they mix energy drinks with alcohol. Caffeine is a diuretic, while alcohol dehydrates the body; translation: prescription for disaster. The DSM IV-TR lists four types of psychiatric disorders involving caffeine: caffeine intoxication (305.90); caffeine-induced sleep disorder (292.85); caffeine-induced anxiety disorder (292.89), and caffeine related disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) (292.9).
Caffeine-induced symptoms now account for nearly 2,500 emergency room visits in the United States each year.

Withdrawal woes
And what happens when a caffeine addict decides to quit? Well, let’s just say it’s no picnic. Withdrawal typically sets in about 12 to 24 hours after
quitting the caffeine. Symptoms include: headaches, extreme fatigue, depression, an inability to concentrate and flu symptoms, such as nausea,
muscle pain and stiffness.

Doctor recommended!
How do doctors feel about high dosages of caffeine? Clearly, it depends on who you ask. While doing research for this article, a young man told me that two of his doctors (his pediatrician and his psychiatrist) both sanctioned his high consumption caffeine intake to counteract the sedation effects of his prescription psychiatric medicinals. When I told the youngster I found this hard to believe, he signed a release for me to speak with his physicians. Sure enough, he was telling the truth. His pediatrician pointed out that the only other option was to place him on Ritalin, which “might have more side effects than caffeine.” Nonetheless, a third physician I spoke with had an alternative slant, telling that she vehemently disagreed with the other two doctors and would never recommend a high intake of caffeinated beverages under any circumstances.

But I thought B vitamins were good for me?
One of the great ironies of energy drinks, gums and shots is that they often contain an array of healthy ingredients, such as B vitamins, herbs, amino acids, taurine and bioflavonoids. However, make no mistake; most of these products are not health food drinks and it is doubtful that these ingredients undo the damage done by the high intake of b stimulants. For example, milk thistle, which is included in several brands of energy
drinks, is used to detoxify the liver. Are these products including milk thistle because the companies who produce them are worried about liver
toxicity? Hey, just asking! I think it’s a legitimate question. Taurine helps flavor many of these drinks and is thought to boost athletic performance.
It may also help lower blood pressure which can be elevated to dangerous levels by stimulant abuse. Here again, is the drink trying to undo
the damage it has done? Many of these beverages are loaded with sugar, artificial sweeteners or high fructose corn syrup—not exactly health foods. If you want a balanced source of vitamins, minerals and amino acids don’t trade your organic green drink or fruit and veggie tabs for an energy drink just yet.

Abuse, not use is the problem!
I must emphasize one extremely important point: You don’t need energy drinks to abuse caffeine. A client of mine was once hospitalized for Pepsi abuse—over 40 cans a day on some occasions! Another man was told by his doctor that he had the highest resting pulse rate his physician had ever seen. I did a little probing and discovered the man was consuming over 30 cups a coffee a day.

A teen I was counseling put the whole thing in perspective, stating, “Some people can drink responsibly while others cannot. It’s the same for
energy drinks. Some energy drinks have less caffeine then my dad’s daily cup of coffee. On the other hand, if I drank six cans of that same drink at a time or chose one with a massive dose of caffeine that’s a different story.”

Tell your clients to drink responsibly; and that includes energy drinks. If they cannot abide by this, then they shouldn’t drink energy drinks or other caffeinated products at all. When clients of this ilk spy a convenience store (or perhaps a vending machine next to the university library) that is their drug dealer. The best clinical advice you can give such clients is to get treatment and keep moving at full throttle.

Howard Rosenthal, EdD, CCMHC,LPC, NCC, MACis the author of the Special 15th Anniversary Edition of the Encyclopedia of Counseling. His books, Favorite Counseling and Therapy Techniques, Classic Anniversary Edition and Favorite Counseling and Therapy Homework Assignments, Classic Anniversary Edition will be released later this year. He serves as Professor and Program Coordinator of Human Services and Addiction Studies at St. Louis Community College at Florissant Valley.

 
The Science of Refined Food Addiction Print E-mail
Feature Articles - Food Addiction
Written by Kay Sheppard, MA, LMHC, CEDS   
Monday, 28 September 2009 15:56

“Show me a man who’s eating dessert, and I’ll show you a man who’s not drinking enough.”    —W.C. Fields

It seems Fields was an early observer of the sugar-alcohol connection. Is it possible that one can be as addictive as the other? Do refined carbohydrates trigger the addictive process? The term food addiction implies there is a physiological, biochemical condition of the body that creates craving for refined carbohydrates. We have come to understand that this craving and its underlying biochemistry is comparable to the alcoholic’s craving for alcohol. Science has begun to show us why. 

Research has shown that food addiction is a biogenetic condition. Dedicated to understanding the biological/genetic basis of ­alcohol addiction, Dr. Ernest Noble and colleagues at UCLA have linked dopamine receptor D2 A1 to addiction. Previously linked to alcohol, cocaine and nicotine addiction, the A1 form of the reward/pleasure gene DRD2 has also been linked to carbohydrate craving and compulsive eating. Noble and his team found that a deficit of these dopamine receptors would cause subjects to be reward or pleasure deficient. To compensate for this deficiency, they discovered that alcohol activated the fewer D2 dopamine receptors stimulating the dopamine reward or pleasure system. According to Dr. Noble, “It is well established that food (particularly carbohydrates), like alcohol, when consumed, increases brain dopamine levels.” He and his team conducted and published a study in 1994, where they found the DRD2 A1 allele to be associated with obesity. “Thus,” he says, “individuals with the A1 allele, having a paucity of D2 dopamine receptors, have a deficiency in their dopamine brain reward system. To compensate for this state, they consume excessive amounts of food which eventuates in the development of obesity” (Noble, 2009; Noble et. al., 1994).

Using brain imaging techniques, neuroscientist Gene-Jack Wang, MD, observed that overeating behavior in morbidly obese individuals is similar to the loss of control and compulsive drug use seen in drug-addicted subjects. He and his team used PET scans to see if obese subjects had similar brain deficits. They measured brain dopamine reward/pleasure receptor levels in subjects with body mass index more than 40. They found these morbidly obese subjects had reductions in dopamine receptors, which were similar to those they observed in drug-addicted subjects (Wang, 2009).

We now see that the brain of the food addict is predisposed to respond differently to addictive foods due to dopamine receptor deficiencies and that addictive foods stimulate and increase the transmission of the neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin. When the brain is flooded with these neurotransmitters, euphoria results leading to the compulsive pursuit of a mood change by engaging repeatedly in episodes of binge eating. Tolerance builds, increasing the frequency and amounts of the substance needed.   

How do addictive food substances compare to other addictive chemicals? Addictive substances are forms of plant life which have been refined or pro­cessed in order to be ingested by drinking, eating, inhaling or injecting. The refinement process facilitates quick absorption of substances into the blood stream which effectively alters brain chemistry and changes mood by flooding the brain with the neurotransmitters serotonin and dopamine. Food addicts seek this mood change by eating refined and processed carbohydrates. This results in short-term highs,  followed by a long period of depressed feelings. In order to avoid the low, the addict eats more. The food addict eats to feel better and always feels worse due to this flooding and depleting of neurotransmitters (Sheppard, K., 2000).

As with all addictions, treatment and recovery are based upon abstinence from all addictive trigger substances. The need to abstain from addictive substances is common to both alcoholics and food addicts. Treatment of food addiction begins by introducing the concept of abstinence from addictive food substances.

But could sugar really be as addictive as cocaine? The findings of Serge Ahmed, PhD, University of Bordeaux, France, a scientist who specializes in addiction research, clearly demonstrate that intense sweetness can surpass cocaine reward, even in drug-sensitized and -addicted individuals. His cocaine-addicted laboratory rats consistently chose sugar over cocaine (Lenoir, M., Serre, F., Cantin L. & Ahmed, S.H., 2007).

Studies using laboratory rats demonstrate that the characteristics of sugar addiction are similar to the binging, withdrawal and craving experienced in drug addiction. These findings further indicate that sugar is potentially as addictive because it is a substance that acts on brain circuits such as the dopamine and opioid pathways (Avena, N.M., Rada, P. & Hoebel, B.G., 2008).

Most of our food supply has been processed and refined to point that it has become more a drug and less a nutrient. Although alarming, it is no surprise to see our country moving toward more refined and processed foods. Whole aisles of food in the grocery store contain no whole foods. The poor quality of our food supply is causing an increase in obesity and other health-related issues. For food addicts, these highly refined foods act as mood-altering drugs with extensive negative health consequences. Refined food choices contribute to serious health issues—physical, mental and emotional—creating a health care crisis. Nancy Appleton, PhD, lists “140 reasons why sugar is ruining your health,” in her recently released book, Suicide by Sugar. Her well-researched list includes many health problems that could be eliminated by abstaining from refined and processed carbohydrates (Appleton, N., 2009). 

You don’t have to be a researcher to recognize the poor quality of our food. In his 2005 standup special, comedian Bill Maher said: “Last year we passed in our Congress this giant Medicare entitlement prescription drug bill. . .and it’s going to cost literally trillions and trillions of dollars. And while they were debating this, nobody ever stood up and said, ‘Excuse me, but why are we so sick?’ Could it be that we eat like Caligula? . . . Folks, it’s the food. I know that people hate to hear that, but when you look at those ads on the evening news at night, people . . . burping and bloating . . . Take a hint . . . You’re not going to die from ­secondhand smoke, or SARS or monkey pox. It’s the food. The call is coming from inside the house. The killer is not West Nile or Avian Flu or shark attacks. It’s the buffalo wings. It’s the aspartame and NutraSweet, and the red dye number two and the high fructose corn syrup and the MSG and the chlorine and whatever . . . is in the special sauce.”

Why is this phenomenon such a secret? For two reasons: denial and deception. Most people don’t want to know what they really need to know about nutrition, and are resistant to changing eating patterns. Because refined and processed foods are available in huge quantities and are marketed with such compelling advertising, the general population does not know, or does not want to know how destructive these foods are to our health and well-being. This is denial, delusion and lack of education in action. How many people watched Morgan Spurlock’s health decline in the documentary film, Super Size Me, and continued to eat fast food? Briefly following the release of that film, the fast food business went on a “health kick” but their good intentions were quickly dismissed when those so-called healthy salads were found to be high in saturated fat, calories and sodium. 

The other reason for the declining quality of our food supply and the resulting health issues is due to outright deception by food processors. Many years ago, I had a conversation with a sweetener distributor who told me that it had been recommended at a food processors convention that, “if you put more sugar in your product, people will buy more.” This “wisdom” has been taken to the ultimate degree. When we walk through grocery stores we see aisle after aisle of food that is virtually unfit for human consumption. One of our finer grocery stores here in Florida has only half an aisle of “health foods” and a three foot section of organic vegetables. That is no surprise because more than 1.6 billion dollars a year are spent marketing junk food to our kids (Federal Trade Commission, 2008).

Our nation’s increasing epidemic of obesity tells only part of the story about the effect of refined and processed foods on our population. Obesity is obvious. What is not obvious is the normal or underweight person who uses unhealthy measures to control weight: drugs, smoking, purging, restrictive diets and excessive exercise. Food abusers and food addicts can come in any size or shape; the health of our entire nation is being undermined by the quality of our food supply. Advocates for healthy eating, Dr. Kelly Brownell and Katherine Battle Horgen, in their book,  Food Fight: The Inside Story of the Food Industry, America’s Obesity Crisis & What We Can Do About It, outline bold public policy initiatives for reversing the obesity epidemic and  present steps individuals can take to safeguard their health in a culture that feeds its pets better than its children (Brownell, K. & Horgen, K.B., 2003). Unhealthy foods are cheaper, readily available, extensively marketed, and often subsidized by your tax dollar. 

The job is daunting. 
The findings of a report entitled Annual Medical Spending Attributable To Obesity: Payer- And Service-Specific Estimates, by Eric A. Finkelstein, Ph.D.; Justin G. Trogdon, Ph.D.; Joel W. Cohen, Ph.D.; and William Dietz, M.D., Ph.D., show that medical spending on conditions associated with obesity has doubled in the past decade, and is estimated to have reached an annual rate of $47 billion in 2008. From 1998 to 2006, annual medical costs due to obesity increased from 6.5 percent to 9.1 percent. In 2006, obese individuals spent 42 percent more (about $1,429) for medical care than did individuals of normal weight.

Traditionally, food addiction has been treated as an “eating disorder” using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Eating Disorders for diagnostic and treatment purposes. This has not been found to be effective for food addicts.  Food addiction more accurately fits the criteria for substance dependence (Sheppard, K., 2000). According to the DSM-IV, substance dependence is a maladaptive pattern of substance use which leads to clinically significant impairment or distress. It is characterized by tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, substance use in larger amounts or for a longer duration than intended, attempts to cut back, excessive time spent pursuing, using or recovering from use, reduction or discontinuation of important activities because of use, and continued use despite adverse consequences (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Overeating can be described as an addiction to refined foods that conforms to the DSM-IV criteria for substance use disorders (Ifland, et al., 2009).
In the early 1980s, clinicians stepped out of the Eating Disorders Box and commenced using the addictions model of treatment for food addicts.

The first steps of such treatment are to break the binge cycle, support through withdrawal and introduce the concept of abstinence from refined and processed foods. The next stage is to provide accurate information about the nature of food addiction—a disease that is primary, chronic, progressive and potentially fatal. The client is encouraged to identify how food addiction affected his or her life and as well as the lives of family members. Orientation to recovery support programs, relapse prevention techniques and development of an ongoing support system help to ensure continuing recovery (Sheppard, K., 1993). We have learned that every healthy choice—whether it is physical, mental or spiritual in nature—is a good recovery choice that heals the addicted brain. 

Kay Sheppard, MA, a licensed mental health ­counselor and certified eating disorder professional, pioneered development of the concept of food addiction. Her best-selling books Food Addiction: The Body Knows; From the First Bite: A Complete Guide to Recovery from Food Addiction and Food Addiction: Healing Day by Day, have become primary resources for food addicts, and addiction professionals. She conducts workshops worldwide, and has an online support recovery forum with a membership of over  5,000 men and women. Visit her website at www.kaysheppard.com, or write her at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

References
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed.). Washington, DC.
Appleton N. (2009). Suicide by Sugar. Garden City Park, NJ.
Avena N.M., Rada P. & Hoebel B.G. (2008). Evidence for sugar addiction: Behavioral and neurochemical effects of ­intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32 (2008).
Brownell, K. & Horgen, K.B. (2003). Food Fight: The Inside Story of the Food Industry, America’s Obesity Crisis & What We Can Do About It. Columbus, OH, McGraw-Hill.
Federal Trade Commission Report (2008). Marketing Food to Children and Adolescents, A Review of Industry Expenditures, Activities, and Self-Regulation, Appendices, Washington, D.C.
http://foodaddictionsummit.org/presenters-noble.htm 
http://foodaddictionsummit.org/presenters-wang.htm 
Ifland, J.R., Preuss H.G., Marcus M.T., Rourke K.M., Taylor, W.C., Burau, K., Jacobs W.S., Kadish, W. & Manso G. (2009). Refined food addiction: A classic substance use disorder. Medical Hypotheses 72 (2009). 
Lenoir, M., Serre, F., Cantin, L. & Ahmed, S.H. (2007). Intense Sweetness Surpasses Cocaine Reward. PLoS ONE 2(8): e698. doi:10.1371/
journal.pone.0000698.
Noble, E.P., Noble, R.E., Ritchie, T., Syndulko, K., Bohlman, M.C., Noble L.A., Zhang, Y., Sparkes, R.S. & Grandy, D.K. (1994). D2 Dopamine Receptor Gene and Obesity. International Journal of Eating Disorders, Vol. 15, No.3. 203-217.
Sheppard, K. (1993). Food Addiction: The Body Knows. Deerfield Beach FL, Health Communications, Inc.
Sheppard, K. (2000). From the First Bite. Deerfield Beach FL, Health Communications, Inc.

This article is published in Counselor, The Magazine for Addiction Professionals, October 2009, v.10, n.5, pp.22-25.

 
Recovery From Food Addiction During the Holidays Print E-mail
Feature Articles - Food Addiction
Sunday, 30 November 2003 16:00

During the holidays, food fests dot the countryside like land mines. The whole world becomes food obsessed. Lifestyle magazines deck supermarket newsstands, presenting all kinds of options for unwholesome food and drinks in ornate silver and gold wrappings. Every holiday boasts its unique edible fare.

Read more...
 
America's Compulsion: Food Addiction Print E-mail
Feature Articles - Food Addiction
Saturday, 31 May 2003 16:00

This year more than 60,000 Americans will struggle with morbid obesity (classified as being 100 pounds or more overweight), and some of those individuals will walk into your office seeking treatment. More than a billion people worldwide, including 22 million children under the age of 5, are now overweight or obese — and the rate in America is increasing. Obesity presently plagues approximately 64.5 percent of adults and 15 percent of children ages 6 to 19 in the U.S. (Grady, 2002).

Read more...
 
Equal Opportunity Destroyer: Males with Eating Disorders Print E-mail
Feature Articles - Food Addiction
Friday, 30 November 2001 16:00

Historically, eating disorders have been viewed as a "female problem." While there have been hundreds of books written about eating disorders over the past 20 years, only two titles have been devoted specifically to men. Published in 1990, Arnold Andersen's book Males With Eating Disorders was the first - and it was written for professionals, not sufferers. At that time it was believed that men accounted for approximately one in ten eating disorder cases (Andersen, 1990).

Read more...